What is Green? What is Greenwash?

So what is “green”? It is about being aware of what we are using and even more importantly what we are wasting. It is about how big our environmental and carbon footprint is and not using more than our fair share.

“Green” is the new black – it is now a fashion in marketing. This should not surprise us because we know that people buy based on emotion and all the recent surveys show that over 90% of Australians are worried about the environment and more than half of us are prepared to pay more for products and services that we perceive as “green” and perceive is the danger word.

Marketers sell on emotion. That is their job but marketing people and business managers need to be aware that false advertising is illegal and the government has tightened the area with new legislation, Green Marketing and the Trade Practices Act, November 2007 and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has launched a crackdown on advertising that cannot be backed up wirh evidence. There are very large fines and they have already been used.

Greenwash is fraud, the ACCC is attacking it, so what is “green”, and where are the grey areas we can fall into where we have exaggerated? We all need to be aware of the consequences.

The ACCC are concerned about the use of emotive images such as frogs, dolphins and pandas. They want to know what the relevance is to the product or service provided. They are also concerned about the use of words like Eco and Enviro and want to know if you can prove you have a right to use these terms. They are warning business about vague phases, such as green, safe for the environment, environmentally preferred, energy efficient and recyclable, which could mislead consumers and they frown on the use of scientific language because the public may not understand it and be misled.

The ACCC guidelines specifically warn against unnecessary claims like this “product is CFC free” because CFC is illegal so all product is CFC free and the claim is irrelevant

One result of businesses wanting to demonstrate their “green” credentials is a whole range of product and environmental certifications with uncertainty about what these mean and even whether the certifications themselves may be a form of greenwashing. This is further confused because some of these certification bodies have set themselves up as “not for profit” organisations which is nice image marketing but every certification they offer feeds into a profit making series of companies. Or is this “profitwash”.

These certifying bodies include Good Environmental Choice Australia (GECA), Ecospecifier and Eco-Buy. While there is an International Standard for this it is not adhered to in Australia. Instead the certifiers mostly certify “along the guidelines of” that standard leaving very real questions about how the standards are audited, who audits them and how transparent the process is.

The Federal Government has Greenhouse Friendly – at least we know who we are dealing with there and we know it is genuinely fee for service costing not a “profitwash” organisation.

Several Industry Associations have their own standards and while some are very rigorous, others are merely a tick the checklist by untrained auditors who are not independent.

It is all very confusing and people just want to buy something with a green tick and feel comfortable that they are doing the right thing.

Some fisheries are certified to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) which has been set up jointly between World Wildlife Fund and a British supermarket chain. MSC has very credible auditing requirements but in Australia it very much overlaps the Environment Protection, Biodiversity and Conservation Act which a legal requirement if fishers are exporting and unfortunately it does not certify the workplace practice in the boats, sheds and processors.

ISO 14001 is certainly the most reputable ‘green” certification partly because it is the International Standard for environmental management with well trained and independent auditors who are also internationally qualified and recognised.

The other real advantage of ISO 14001 is to the sustainability of the business itself. Instead of just adding an overhead onto the business it helps save money as well as the environment because it is about managing the practices and behaviour throughout the business. It is about identifying “issues” and continually improving. A business with ISO 14001 can make a mistake but needs to be able to identify how and why that was possible and demonstrate to the auditor that you will prevent it from happening again.

As a consumer, you can be confident that buying from an ISO 14001 company is buying from a business with a robust and recognised certification and as a business person wanting to demonstrate environmental responsibility you have an internationally recognised certification and all the provable green marketing and positioning plus a means of saving money and helping your business.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

5 Responses to “What is Green? What is Greenwash?”

  1. Delwyn Jones Says:

    Are you suggesting that green companies who certify green credential should not be profitable with you “profitwash”.
    Pioneering bodies such as Good Environmental Choice Australia (GECA),
    Ecospecifier and Eco-Buy certainly apply the ISO 14000 series standards.

    I know two distinctly separate third party auditors of one, and the long history of leading edge life ISO 14000 series standard life cycle analysis work that underpins the other two. So I find your suggestion that they do not adhere to the relevant International Standard in Australia most dubious.

    ISO 14001 companies can be compliance performers on an improvement track which is great but they are not always leading in environmental performance. On the other hand Good Environmental Choice Australia (GECA), Ecospecifier and Eco-Buy assess the top performers in class.

    I look forward to a healthy debate.

  2. Paul Wiszniak Says:

    I didnt hear it as being anti-profit, rather anti-profiteering, or was that false prophets?

    The seminal paper by Terrachoice on the ‘Six Sins of Greenwash’ http://www.terrachoice.com/Home/Six%20Sins%20of%20Greenwashing/The%20Six%20Sins
    sets out to explain the fundamental problem of marketers delivering half truths or downright lies. In this and other similar papers the benefits of Accreditation and Certification are drawn into question when the essence of those programmes relies on wafer thin assurance and identity.
    A manufacturer can fairly easily tailor all but the worst existing products to pass muster under most ‘labelling’ regime’s, and, most consumers do not recognise any of the previously mentioned certifying companies – certainly not without ambiguity.
    On a B2B level some of these things mean a lot, but in consumer-land they’re mostly none the wiser.
    It takes money and time to get listed on GECA, ES, EB and the rest, so that usually eliminates the riff raff, but I found the criteria and methodology applied by them ‘generous’.
    What we need is rock solid product certification that is marketed and positioned into consumers minds with absolute clarity.

  3. Jean Cannon Says:

    I am basing my comments on listening to a talk by Petar Johson, CEO of GECA in which he vigorously attacked the ISO 14001 standard and when asked stated that they only “follow the guidelines of the ISO 14020 series”.

    I feel that auditing against an international standard by qualified auditors is the best way to go.

    I would certainly hope that companies are profitable, especially those that go to the extra trouble to certify their green credentials. My questions are about businesses that claim to be “no profit” but set up a series of profitable companies around them. I would rather they were honest about the fact that their certification business is a profitable enterprise as are auditing bodies like SAI Global, SGS, NCSI etc. No one in their right mind is opposed to business making a profit – it is necessary to continue in business.
    I agree with Paul Wisniak that we need rock solid certification.

  4. Funky Green Things - Sustainable & Stylish » What makes funky green things ‘green’? Says:

    [...] by these recent news reports, and this blog post on ‘Envirojean’, I thought it would be worth thinking about what makes the funky green things on this site [...]

  5. Jean Cannon Says:

    Delwyn, Petar Johnson of GECA states that they audit “along the guidelines of” the ISO 14020 series. I find “along the guidelines of” a little less definite as “against”.

    He also vigorously attacks ISO 14001 in public which I also find usual and disappointing. Not every business with ISO 14001 is perfect but they are committed to complying with legislation and with continually improving. My experience is that companies do significantly improve! If there is a problem with a business not complying with legislation, this is an issue for the auditors and the relevant auditing bodies can and should be contacted.

    My comment about profit wash is based on concern about some businesses that are definitely paying their staff and CEO’s better than some so called profitable businesses and who, in some cases, channel their certifications or other services into profit making businesses. Then the question arises about whether “not for profit” is a confidence boosting marketing ploy.

Leave a Reply