<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emissions trading and lobby groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/</link>
	<description>Save Money with ISO 14001 and other systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/#comment-813</guid>
		<description>My belief is that all sectors need to be included.  I do not agree with postponing the inclusion of transport and agriculture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My belief is that all sectors need to be included.  I do not agree with postponing the inclusion of transport and agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Haselden</title>
		<link>http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Haselden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.envirojean.com/2008/06/25/emissions-trading-and-lobby-groups/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>So, the worst thing Australia could do would be to follow New Zealand down the path of incurring all the costs of an ETS, while missing out on all the economic and environmental benefits.  Associate Professor Richard Denniss stated that New Zealand has gone for the worst of both worlds, but hopefully Australia can do better.

I&#039;m interested, please tell me more about the worst of both worlds,
regarding New Zealand&#039;s ETS decision.

Regards

Jeremy Haselden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the worst thing Australia could do would be to follow New Zealand down the path of incurring all the costs of an ETS, while missing out on all the economic and environmental benefits.  Associate Professor Richard Denniss stated that New Zealand has gone for the worst of both worlds, but hopefully Australia can do better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested, please tell me more about the worst of both worlds,<br />
regarding New Zealand&#8217;s ETS decision.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Jeremy Haselden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
